Interpretation and limitations The results of this analysis should be interpreted in the context of data availability. ● Risk classifications reflect potential exposure, not confirmed non-compliance ● 30% of suppliers who were contacted completed the self-assessment, which, while positive, leaves room for increased engagement ● Publicly available data sources may underrepresent or over-represent issues in certain regions or sectors As a result, the absence of identified risks should not be interpreted as an absence of actual risk. Implications for due diligence The findings indicate a need to shift focus from risk identification to risk verification and engagement. In particular, increased supplier transparency and improved data quality are necessary to strengthen the reliability of our assessments and ensure effective follow-up of identified risks Key implications for Kverneland Group include: ● The need to increase supplier transparency, particularly in relation to human rights and working conditions ● A stronger focus on medium-priority suppliers, where risk exposure exists but data is availability can be improved ● Continued monitoring of all our suppliers with enhanced due diligence measures
8
4. Measures, Actions, and Continuous Improvement 4.1 Mitigation
While no confirmed adverse impacts requiring mitigation were identified in 2025, Kverneland Group has strengthened its capacity to identify and address risks through improved monitoring systems and increased supplier engagement. These measures enhance our ability to act promptly if risks are identified. 4.2 Remediation & compensation Although no cases requiring remediation were identified in 2025, established procedures are in place to address potential adverse impacts. These include supplier dialogue, corrective action plans, and, where relevant, cooperation on remediation measures in line with international standards. 4.3 Looking forward 2025 represents a transition from pilot phase to scaled implementation of due diligence processes risk assessment. From a business perspective, the work to increase transparency across the entire supply chain is also valuable. Kverneland Group will further formalise its due diligence efforts by setting clear targets for supplier engagement and assessment.
Our objective is to ensure that all suppliers classified as high and medium priority are engaged and have completed the Labour & Human Rights self-assessment, providing sufficient data to enable a meaningful evaluation of their human rights and working conditions risks. Through this process, we aim
Powered by FlippingBook